The job before us is to build on that victory. I realize the media man begs to differ, I'll back it up with FOUR iron-clad reasons:

1) The defined state of victory, by left and right alike, is that we have a stable, democratic government in Iraq. Democratic? Check, elected in January, 2006. Stable? Check, though only recently. PM Al-Maliki's recent and on-going beat-down of Sadr and his militia is removing the final serious threat that could have overthrown the government. We knew he was defeated when he declared victory and vacated the battlefield, the predominant sign of a loser in the Arab world. After you win you don't leave, you stay and take advantage of that victory. Instead Sadr is hiding in Iran, pretending to study to be an Ayatollah, a process that would take him at least 8 more years. What he is not doing is suffering casualties while clearing the Iraqi government out of their capitol. Instead, Americans and Iraqis are currently suffering casualties while clearing fighters out of Sadr city. This is removing the most serious threat to stability and was spear-headed by the Iraqis, not America.

2) Al-Qaeda has been driven from power in Iraq, and they can't return. After September 11th, Al-Qaeda was on the hunt for a new target. Instead of civilians in Los Angeles, they faced American troops in Iraq. Al-Qaeda responded, causing much more death and destruction - particularly their bombing of the Askariya Golden Dome in Samarra that seriously threatened defeat and civil war - than we in the military planned. But we recovered as President Bush, Sen. John McCain and others came up with a new strategy to defeat Al-Qaeda's attack and now Al-Qaeda is hated by almost every Iraqi. An Arab country is the worst enemy Al-Qaeda has today. That is a military victory turned into a victory of ideas.

3) Iraqi's overwhelmingly view the US as a liberator and an honest broker of remaining tensions. This one, I give to the troops. Not just "The Troops", but to those junior enlisted, officers and NCO's who overcame the Abu Ghraib media hype and cultural tensions and proved to the Iraqis, in person, day by painful, bloody day, that they were there not as occupiers but as allies. Men and women who cared about the Iraqis, wanted them to succeed and treated them with respect and dignity.

4.) The American media has admitted we've won. Ok, I made that one up. That will NEVER happen. MSNBC's Keith Olbermann, lying on his deathbed 45 years from now as Iraq is celebrating its fifth decade of freedom, will insist the war is lost, Iraq is a quagmire and the only solution is to close down the "Ramadi US Air Force Base And Golf Course Fun Zone" and come home in honorable defeat. This is something we must all realize: the media would sooner shift their Democratic party contributions to the Dick Cheney Hunting Club than admit they were wrong on Iraq. This is because they never believed what they were saying was true, they were hoping that by saying it they could make it happen. They saw Iraq as a means to repeat their great Vietnam victory, where they turned victory on the battlefield into defeat at home.

I'll follow up Monday with reasons why we won the war, but here's a hint. Our task now is to understand that we've won, to not be afraid of declaring victory in the face of ongoing media declarations of defeat and to make something of our victory. We cannot rest on our laurels, defeat in Vietnam was snatched from the jaws of victory almost two years after the military departed. We have to turn our battlefield victories into political ones.  We owe it to those soldiers who paid for that victory with their lives.

Jason
5/1/2008 9:31:00 AM Discuss
Vote for recipients to receive the statement of appreciation.
Until a more formal voting page is created, simply reply to this post to nominate a recipient. If your nominee is already listed, reply directly under that comment. A reply to that comment counts as a vote. You can vote for more than one person. Thanks,
AfC
4/26/2008 3:11:00 PM Discuss
The truth behind the hype.
A recent survey for the Department of Veterans Affairs found that 18 percent of vets recently back from tours of duty are out of work -- and a quarter of those with jobs earn less than $21,840 per year. In the first two years after leaving military service, the official unemployment rate for veterans was 9.5 percent -- more than double the 4.3 percent rate for a group of demographically similar nonvets.
 
Wow, that sounds really bad. Combat vets are unemployed at rates twice as high as civilians. That could only mean that vets are victims of this terrible Bush/Cheney misguided war, right? Or could there be another reason?

Anyone out there heard of military leave? Most troops coming home from overseas have at least a month or more of paid vacation.

Anyone out there ever heard of unemployment? Most returning Guard and Reserve soldiers are eligible for unemployment benefits. I'm not a fan of this, but the facts are that a soldier fresh home from Iraq can draw unemployment pay for about 3 months. And that's after their military leave is done.

Anyone out there heard of combat pay? Soldiers in a combat zone are paid extra for being in a dangerous area, and we pay no state or federal income taxes on pay earned in a combat zone. For many soldiers, that means a 20% pay raise while in country. Since there isn't much to spend your money on while in Iraq, is it hard to believe that many military folks save their money and splurge when they get home by not having to work?

And has anyone out there heard of the GI Bill? That's the VA program started in the 1940's to let combat vets go to college on the government's dime. Partly as a reward for serving the country, and partly as a means of advancing a huge group of people in their level of education. Millions of the Greatest Generation took advantage of the opportunity.

Flash forward to 2008. Over a million men and women have served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nearly every one has now qualified for the GI Bill, and many also qualify for federal or state tuition assistance. For example, a soldier with Minnesota's Red Bulls that got home last summer qualifies for federal tuition assistance, which pays up to $250 per semester credit at almost any college. That's just tuition assistance. The GI Bill pays full time students up to $1100 per month for living expenses.

So for many returning combat vets, going to college is a money making proposition. But Ms Saunders makes no mention of this huge program. She just assumes that all combat vets, fresh home from the war, are desperate to go back to work and unable to. There's overtones of John Kerry's infamous gaffe in here-that we are all blue collar workers and couldn't possibly be smart enough to attend college.

For the record, here's what Webster's has to say-

veteran
Main Entry:
vet·er·an

Pronunciation:
ve-tə-rən, ˈve-trən\
Function: noun
Etymology:
Latin veteranus, from veteranus, adjective, old, of long experience, from veter-, vetus old
Date: 1509
1 a: an old soldier of long service b: a former member of the armed forces 2: a person of long experience usually in some occupation or skill (as politics or the arts)



victim
Main Entry:
vic·tim

Pronunciation:
vik-təm\
Function: noun
Etymology:
Latin victima; perhaps akin to Old High German wīh holy
Date: 15th century
1: a living being sacrificed to a deity or in the performance of a religious rite 2: one that is acted on and usu. adversely affected by a force or agent : as a (1): one that is injured, destroyed, or sacrificed under any of various conditions
(2): one that is subjected to oppression, hardship, or mistreatment b: one that is tricked or duped

The definitions of victim strikes me as particularly relevant. People like Ms Saunders like to crow about how bad us vets are being treated, not because they care but because they need us as a weapon to hurl at the White House. In our informal meeting with Sen Klobuchar last week, she deflected questions of Iraq with talk of her work on helping veterans with health care and benefits. She looked at us with almost pity, a minority that needed her help to secure our benefits. Veteran's issues is the stick she wields against those that criticize her for her stance on the war. Klobuchar and Saunders say 'See? I support the troops by doing what I do best-treating people like victims and then funding a government program to help them."
I am used to be a pawn on the field of battle, but to be used as a pawn in the battle of politics is more than I can stomach.

To Ms Saunders and Sen Klobuchar, I say quit treating us as victims that need your protection, and start respecting us as veterans who are intelligent enough to know what we have been through.
daveiniraq
4/25/2008 6:33:00 PM Discuss
"Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth." -G.W.
The goal of this site is to create a community of active military and vets who are a strong force for freedom in American politics.  We hope to do this by creating a place where you can easily post and discuss your views as reports (aka diaries or blogs) and post and discuss news articles you find interesting.

  Building upon the success of the initial Appeal For Courage effort, we will create a community for currently serving military & vets to become active in the political process which affects us, often in matters of life or death. The community is focused on promoting valid political participation of military members within regulations and the spirit of a civilian-led military. We welcome vets of all stripes and vets have all the same rights/privileges of currently military (after all, we’ll all be vets one day).

 In addition we welcome anyone to post comments and voice their opinion, civilian and military alike.

  For currently serving military your freedom of speech is probably greater than you may think, simply ensure anything you say conforms with UCMJ Article 88.  In brief, it says you shall not use "contemptuous words" against any elected official or anyone with 'secretary' in front of their name.  We will use as light a hand as possible in moderating comments.

 Thank you! We look forward to discussing the day’s events with you!
AfC
4/14/2008 6:46:00 PM Discuss