Few states let overseas troops vote by e-mail


"The personnel that fight our wars, the people who are most affected by the decisions on the use of the military, are being systematically denied the right to vote," said Bob Carey, a board member of the Overseas Vote Foundation, a voting rights group. Carey, a Navy reservist who has served in Iraq, noted that ballots are often not prepared and ready to be mailed until 30 to 45 days before an election. And since it can take more than two weeks for troops to get ballots by regular mail, they sometimes get them too late to meet voting deadlines.
Jason says: We in the military often take a hard line on our own shortcomings. We don't vote, it's our fault, no whining allowed!

  The fact is, the responsibility to vote - and get our junior personnel to vote - is ours alone, and pushing for more electronic voting is how we should be doing it.  Electronic voting is not only faster, it allows for instant correction of mistakes so that the ballots are actually counted.  During the Florida elections in 2000, thousands of military votes were denied because of improperly filled in forms. Whose fault is that? Ours. How do we fix it? We insist on being able to vote electronically.
Jason
4/27/2008 6:53:00 AM Discuss (1)
Sunni's return to government proves political progress


"The Front agreed to return in part because of the security offensive that al-Maliki launched last month against Shiite militiamen in the southern port city of Basra...Abdul-Sattar did not elaborate, but the offensive appeared to have signaled to the Accordance Front that al-Maliki was willing to go after the Sadrists, whose support won him the prime minister's job in 2006."
Nichols says:

There has been a lot of political progress in Iraq since the surge began establishing the necessary conditions, but the Maliki government's independent action to reign in the rebel militias has been the most dramatic.  Although it was downplayed and even portrayed negatively in US media, it was seen as a huge success to the Iraqi public and greatly boosted faith in the new government.

Nichols
4/17/2008 3:48:00 PM Discuss (0)
General Petraeus is UK Telegraph's Man of the Year; US Media suddenly unaware of Iraq.


A failed Iraq would not just be a second Vietnam, nor would it just be America's problem. It would be a symbolic victory for al-Qaeda, a safe haven for jihadists to plot future September 11s and July 7s, and a battleground for a Shia-Sunni struggle that could draw in the entire Middle East. Our future peace and prosperity depend, in part, on fixing this mess. And, a year ago, few had much hope. To appreciate the scale of the task Gen Petraeus took on, it is necessary to go back to February 22, 2006. Or, as Iraqis now refer to it, their own September 11. That was when Sunni-led terrorists from al-Qaeda blew up the Shia shrine in the city of Samarra, an act of provocation that finally achieved their goal of igniting sectarian civil war.
LCDR_Nichols says: December is on track to be the month with the lowest US casualties since the Sammarra mosque bombing, and possibly the fewest of any month, and the US media has few, if any reports on it.  The media's silence on Iraqi success, coming so soon after their cacophony of defeatism,  is deafening.

LCDR_Nichols
12/30/2007 11:02:00 PM Discuss (1)
General David Petraeus’s End Of Year Letter To The Troops


Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen, and Civilians of Multi-National Force-Iraq:

As 2007 draws to a close, you should look back with pride on what you, your fellow troopers, our Iraqi partners, and Iraqi Coalition civilians have achieved in 2007. A year ago, Iraq was racked by horrific violence and on the brink of civil war. Now, levels of violence and civilians and military casualties are significantly reduced and hope has been rekindled in many Iraqi communities. To be sure, the progress is reversible and there is much more to be done. Nonetheless, the hard-fought accomplishments of 2007 have been substantial, and I want to thank each of you for the contributions you made to them.
...
While the progress in a number of areas is fragile, the security improvements have significantly changed the situation in many parts of Iraq.
...
Iraq’s leaders reached agreement on the Declaration of Principles for Friendship and Cooperation with the United States,
LCDR_Nichols says: Summary: We're winning, still  lots to do, keep up the good work.
LCDR_Nichols
12/28/2007 9:51:00 PM Discuss (0)
Another war opponent returns from Iraq with a positive message.


In addition to a reduction in violence, she said the government of Iraq has made progress in a number of areas, including a national budget. “From top to bottom, our military and our civilian leadership as well will tell you there is not a tactical military solution to this war. It has to be political,” she said.
LCDR_Nichols says: I've always confused whenever anyone pounds the desk and hysterically insists that "There is no military-only solution for Iraq!". 

     No kidding. Who said there was?

     It's actually a form of accusation, the assumption being that the accuser's political opponents think there is a purely military solution, even though no one has ever said anything to that effect.  You're then expected to admire the accuser's insightful analysis that no, you can't kill everyone on Earth to reach a democratic state in Iraq.

     Curiously, war opponents often maintain that there is a political-only solution to Iraq and we should withdraw our military while leaving Al-Qaeda's forces free reign. Presumably they'll stop chopping off heads and bombing schools long enough to notice the country has voted them to leave, then politely pack up their weapons and depart in an orderly manner.

     Pursuing a military-only strategy or a political-only strategy are equally foolish policies. The difference being only one of these strategies is actually being voiced by anyone involved.
LCDR_Nichols
12/26/2007 6:58:00 AM Discuss (0)
Who Owns the Vietnam War?


Among the new generation of historians of the Vietnam war, important debates and differences still remain—for example, over the efficacy of American tactics of counterinsurgency and pacification. But they overwhelmingly agree on one point: the old account is a myth, and no longer stands up to scrutiny. It is worthwhile reviewing some of the main findings of the new scholarship before returning to the question of their relevance, if any, to our present struggle in Iraq
LCDR_Nichols says:   There's a worry among war opponents that victory in Iraq will prove they were wrong about Vietnam as well.  It's time to change the false narrative that Vietnam was a mistake where failure was inevitable. It, like Iraq, was a just cause that we were right to pursue. Like Iraq, the main threat was attacks on our will and motivation from ideological opponents at home.   Unfortunately in the case of Vietnam, war opponents won and millions of Vietnamese died and further generations lived, and continue to live, under the oppression of socialism because of it.

Vietnam vets have been instrumental, perhaps essential, in our success in Iraq.  Iraq vets can repay their aid by reversing the historical revisionists who have tried to paint Vietnam as a mistake.
LCDR_Nichols
12/24/2007 3:08:00 AM Discuss (0)
Lawmakers play favorites over earmarks; Marines die.


Doug Hoschek sells the Army's elite Special Forces a T-shirt that resists burning — a feature that can save the lives of soldiers under fire. But Hoschek was stunned to learn recently that another company, InSport International, snagged the T-shirt contracts without having to compete. InSport had lobbied members of Congress for an "earmark" — federal dollars lawmakers direct to favor seekers, often campaign donors. Company executives also donated nearly $9,000 to the re-election effort of Rep. David Wu, D-Ore., who sponsored three earmarks for InSport. The lobbying worked, despite a flaw with InSport's synthetic T-shirt. It melts to the skin under intense heat, causing serious burns.
LCDR_Nichols says: This is a perfect example as to why it's both vital and appropriate for military members to have a political voice.  The paper's headline is actually "Lawmakers play favorites; local merchant loses out."

We're a little more focused on the fact that Marines are more likely to die.
LCDR_Nichols
12/18/2007 10:51:00 PM Discuss (0)
Smart Money - Iraq's bonds rise on International market.


"Holders of Iraqi bonds are giving President George W. Bush a vote of confidence. The country's $2.7 billion of 5.8 percent bonds due in 2028 returned 15.2 percent since July, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. index data. Only Ecuador's debt gained more, rising 18 percent. Iraq's securities yield 6.21 percentage points more than Treasuries, the most of any dollar-denominated government debt."
LCDR_Nichols says: Most people (myself included) have an emotional bias which affects their judgment, for or against Iraq's future. The rise in the bonds is the result of thousands of people making decisions unaffected by this emotion. They simply want to make money from the bonds, and they buy the ones that offer the best chance of doing that. It's also encouraging - and went largely unreported - that Iraq recently repaid it's IMF loan 2 years ahead of schedule.
LCDR_Nichols
12/15/2007 11:47:00 PM Discuss (0)
USA Today acknowledges progress, states "Democrats are lost in time".


"Our view on war in Iraq: Surge's success holds chance to seize the moment in Iraq. Instead, Democrats are lost in time, Bush lowers the bar for Baghdad."
LCDR_Nichols says: Interesting editorial from an editorial board which has been unfriendly toward the war effort. Now they are admitting we are succeeding and add the trademark USA Today graphs showing progress. Of course they include negatives, but most of their criticisms amount to little more than acknowledging that the surge hasn't been a universal panacea.
LCDR_Nichols
12/15/2007 11:22:00 PM Discuss (0)
Gitmo detainess have more rights than WWII prisoners


Detainees in the war on terror will have the presumption of innocence and an automatic appeal, the latter not even afforded to U.S. citizens.....Steven A. Engel, Justice Department deputy assistant attorney general, said that extending the peacetime notion of habeas corpus to military prisoners would be "unprecedented."
J.T.Nichols says: A common attack on America is to falsely claim that captured terrorists are protected by the US Constitution, habeas corpus or the Geneva Convention and then say we are violating our principles because we don't treat prisoners in strict accordance with these rules. The US Constitution (and Habeas Corpus) only applies to US citizens and the Geneva Conventions only applies to lawful combatants of a state military. It's insulting because we treat these prisoners better than any country treats it's native prison population, while we punish and imprison our guards who violate prisoner's rights, as we did at Abu Ghraib. America isn't perfect, but it's unethical to use our detention of terrorists as a means to attack us.
J.T.Nichols
12/11/2007 10:10:00 PM Discuss (0)
Murtha finds military progress in trip to Iraq


"I think the 'surge' is working,"
J.T.Nichols says: When I saw Murtha was coming here to visit I had mixed feelings. On the one hand I know we need to communicate as much as possible with Congress, on the other hand after his last trip he said it convinced him we needed to leave, something I knew to be incorrect. But I guess he's coming around.
J.T.Nichols
11/30/2007 9:44:00 PM Discuss (1)
Looking At Iraq In Macro-time


An Iraq that is reasonably stable, fairly democratic, more prosperous and productive than the Middle Eastern standard: This seems to be at least one possible trajectory from the success of the surge. That would be a considerable achievement, with positive reverberations for decades to come.
J.T.Nichols says: Good article that discusses a problem I've had with the war opponents for a long time, that they seem to be sacrificing the future -both Iraq's and America's- for short term gain. If we had done to Korea as they recommend doing to Iraq now, the world would be a much darker place today.
J.T.Nichols
11/18/2007 11:58:00 PM Discuss (0)
Is the war won?


AQI has been pronounced dead before but this does seem to be a sustained trend. More importantly, if Baghdad really is secure, it means that there’s at least a chance of political progress being made.
Thul says: No one wants to announce that the war is won for fear that AQ will come roaring back tomorrow. But the security we set out to establish via the Surge is now a reality. If the Iraqi government can do their part, then the war will truly be won.
Thul
11/16/2007 6:07:00 AM Discuss (0)
Iraqis Wasting An Opportunity, U.S. Officers Say


In more than a dozen interviews, U.S. military officials expressed growing concern over the Iraqi government's failure to capitalize on sharp declines in attacks against U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians. A window of opportunity has opened for the government to reach out to its former foes, said Army Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the commander of day-to-day U.S. military operations in Iraq, but "it's unclear how long that window is going to be open."
J.T.Nichols says: This is complete nonsense. First, we’re not favoring SCIRI over Sadr, that’s simply fabricated from whole clothe. Second, the WaPo took the statements out of context and cherry-picked them to create a story. Why believe they are accurately representing anything close to reality? General Petraeus thinks the Iraqi gov’t is working hard under difficult circumstances, and they are spending billions of oil money on hundreds of reconstruction projects all across the country. It’s frustrating to see media outlets report “It would be nice if things were better” as if it were news. The WaPo is pushing the false narrative that political progress is weak to avoid reporting the real progress on security, progress they said would never come.
J.T.Nichols
11/15/2007 11:08:00 PM Discuss (4)